https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbcqu_gVHaU
<방송스크립트>
do you think this is affecting uh employers maybe in choosing younger people for a job to be saying that they they're seeing this lower maturation or this they're saying this person's got a degree from u of t but i've heard bad things that degrees aren't worth it well there's a couple of problems with the degrees is that everyone has one that's the first one which is so because scarcity matters obviously um the second thing is is that the match between the degree and the workplace hasbecome less and less self-evident you know what should happen when you go to university is you should learn how to think and formulate arguments you should learn to think speak and write that's what the humanities are for they're to make you dangerous right because if you can think and speak and write you're deadly in a complex job you're exactly what's necessary but if you don't have that it's like what the hell good is the degree so i mean degree in english literature doesn't prepare you for a job it couldmake you think write and speak which prepares you for any complex job and that's what's supposed to happen but increasingly i think that doesn't happen and the employers are waking up to this very rapidly so and they're i mean they've already known that most for most complex positions they have to train their people now they're thinking well why do i have to bother with the degree if i'm going to train them if it isn't bringing anything of value you see this and even it feels like law when i went to do adebate at queen's university three weeks ago i think they couldn't get anybody to debate me you know they the guy had to pay play devil's advocate we were talking about bill c-16 i thought jesus that's so pathetic i'm talking about legal matters and i meant the greatest in one of the greatest universities in the west you know i mean it's in the top 200 let's say um i couldn't get someone to argue with the stupid psychology professor about law he had to get a devil's advocate and soone of the things that was really disheartening talking to the students was they told me four or five of them they're not learning a damn thing in law it's all social justice nonsense it's like well good that'll do in the profession it's being done in any ways because lawyers being replaced by automation and so a lot of what they do is dig up information it's like well you can do that on your own and forms are proliferating like mad so the law school should be teaching you to be a monsteryou better be but you come out you're concerned with social welfare oh god it's like well there's just nothing to that it's like you could come out and say you're you want to be nice to people well that's nice good you go right ahead it's like i'll go find someone who can do something and you can go be nice to people and see how effective that is so it's a lot of things that are conspiring in the same direction people don't have to have get married to have sex so we have no idea what that's going todo although we know one thing it's done is the only people who get married now are rich right which is another thing that's really comical because the feminist idea in the 60s was that marriage was an oppressor oppressive patriarchal institution it's like okay fine then why do only rich women get married now because that is the case and so for poorer women the dissolution of marriage has been an absolute catastrophe they are so screwed because they have kids so they're working they've got their90-hour work week man that's for sure they're much less attractive to potential mates so they get low quality men often parasitical and predatory so they often have like jobs in retail for example which are just dreadful you don't even know what your schedule is going to be you get paid hardly anything you know it's really but if you know most of the women who who who are outspoken feminists are on the successful end of the socio-economic distribution they're university students or people like that they don't even knowany poor women so they have no idea what their lives are like and you would never know because they're at home working you know they're either at their horrible job or they're at home slaving away with their kids so it's not like they're out there telling you what's wrong with them so a way to fix this like i i ta so sometimes i see my students a lack of there's no critical thinking like when you teach a language it's almost like it's like a mathematical problem like a logic association with conjugation ofverbs and i feel sometimes they're lacking in this basic knowledge of how to put two and two together you know the best way the best way to teach people critical thinking is to teach them to write and i made this little thing that i put online it's i don't know if maybe it is it in the psych 434 website did i post that rubric for essay writing but i don't think it actually went through i think it but it is still on 4 30.is it not on 434 is that not working oh oh okay well there's an essay oh that's too bad it's not on the site 434 website even because i updated it anyways i have this guide to writing that's that if it isn't on the 434 website it is definitely on the 430 website and uh it steps people through the process of writing because what's happened now it's very hard to teach people to write because it's unbelievably time intensive and like writing marking a good essay that's really easy check ayou did everything right right marking a bad essay oh my god the words are wrong the phrases are wrong the sentences are wrong they're not ordered right in the paragraphs the paragraphs aren't coherent and the whole thing makes no sense so trying to tell the person what they did wrong it's like well you did everything wrong everything about this essay is wrong well that's not helpful either you have to find the few little things they did half right and you have to teach them what they did wrong it's really expensiveand so what i did with this rubric was try to address that from the production side instead of the grading side but the best thing you can do is teach people to write because there's no difference between that and thinking and one of the things that just blows me away about universities is that no one ever tells students why they should write something it's like well you have to do this assignment well why are you writing well you need the great it's like no you need to learn to think because thinking makes you acteffectively in the world thinking makes you win the battles you undertake and those could be battles for good things if you can think and speak and write you are absolutely deadly nothing can get in your way so that's why you learn to write it's like when i can't believe that people aren't just told that it's it's like it's the most powerful weapon you can possibly provide someone with and i mean i know lots of people who've been staggeringly successful and watched them throughout my life i mean those peopleyou don't want to have an argument with them they'll just slash you into pieces and not in a malevolent way it's like if you're going to make your point and they're going to make their point you better have your points organized because otherwise you're going to look like and be an absolute idiot you are not going to get anywhere and if you can formulate your arguments coherently and make a presentation if you can speak to people if you can lay out a proposal god people give you moneythey give you opportunities you have influence that's what you're at university for and so that's what you do is you that's you're in you're in english right you're and yeah new languages anyways it's like yeah teach people to be articulate because that's the most dangerous thing you can possibly be so and that's motivating if people know that it's like well why are you learning to write because you're here's your sword here's your m16 right here's yourbulletproof vest like you learn how to use them but it's just it's an endless mystery to me why that isn't made self-evident so that's the sort of thing that can drive you mad trying to sort out it's like people are there's a there's a conspiracy to bring people into the education system to make them weaker so i guess that keeps the competition down maybe that's one way of thinking about it if your students are stupid they're not going to challenge you you
요약
조던 피터슨(Jordan Peterson)은 비판적 사고와 의사소통 기술을 배우는 것의 중요성을 강조하면서 대학 학위의 가치 하락에 대해 논의합니다. 그는 또한 가난한 여성의 결혼 해산이 가져올 부정적인 결과에 대해서도 언급합니다.
하이라이트
🎓 대학 학위는 풍부하고 학위와 직장 기술 간의 명확한 연관성이 부족하여 그 가치가 점점 낮아지고 있습니다.
🤔 대학 교육의 주요 목표는 비판적 사고, 논증 공식화, 의사소통 기술을 가르치는 것이어야 합니다.
📚 예를 들어 영문학 학위는 복잡한 취업 준비를 위한 사고, 쓰기, 말하기 능력 개발에 중점을 두어야 합니다.
💼 고용주는 특히 상당한 교육이 필요한 역할의 경우 학위의 필요성을 재평가하고 있습니다.
👰 결혼의 해산은 가난한 여성에게 부정적인 영향을 미치고 있으며, 기회와 지원이 더 적습니다.
🖋️ 사람들에게 효과적으로 글쓰기를 가르치는 것은 사고력과 의사소통 능력을 향상시키는 강력한 방법입니다.
🗣️ 명확하고 설득력 있는 주장을 할 수 있는 능력은 인생의 성공, 영향력 및 기회에 매우 중요합니다.
https://x.com/esprecchiato/status/1711234503740670373?t=rI-jIuaXOJhd6xHSf5YlzA&s=32